I’m currently working on editing my next anthology, THREE TIME TRAVELERS WALK INTO…
I have stories from some great Big Name authors: David Gerrold, Jonathan Maberry, Jody Lynn Nye, Lawrence Watt-Evans, Peter David, Allen Steele, Adam-Troy Castro, Gail Z. Martin, Keith DeCandido, James Moore, and L. Penelope!
Then I sent out word that I was looking for more stories and received more than 100 submissions for what may only be 5 or 6 spots left in the book.
Some stories made it to my “maybe” folder but clearly there is no way I can put every single story there. I have to narrow down the selection somehow. So some stories were rejected after the first read-through.
That’s how it works. It’s part of the business and you can’t take it personally. I have had stories rejected by friends and I have had to reject friends, and we all understand it.
But not everyone is like that.
Thought you might like to see an example of how not to deal with rejection. This one author did not handle it well, and insulted me by basically saying that clearly, the only reason his magnificent story was rejected was because I was just plain wrong.
All of our email exchanges below are absolutely true. I am not naming the person, but I am certainly telling other editors out there, because no one is going to want to deal with him. He posted nasty comments about this on my Facebook page so he outed himself anyway (in case you feel like searching for it).
Typos are in the original.
We’ll start with the standard form rejection letter I send out, which he received along with many others. My emails are in italics.
Dear Fellow Author:
As a writer with my own collection of rejection letters, I am well aware of how disappointing it is to get one.
I hate sending them as much as I hate receiving them.
I’m afraid your story didn’t make the cut.
Sometimes the story is good but the reason I have to reject it is because I already have a story with a similar theme or similar characters. Sometimes it’s because I may have liked your story but saw that it needed some substantive editing, and I would rather pick another good story that did not need it. Sometimes I like the story but I just have too many stories I like and I just can’t accept them all. Sometimes, honestly, it’s just not that well-written.
Some of the stories I have rejected so far are because there just wasn’t a story there. There would be three people from history, and they’d talk, and some stuff happened, but there wasn’t an adventure. There wasn’t a conflict that needed to be resolved. The characters were the same at the end of the story as they were at the start of the story. It may have had an interesting concept, but that was it. The setting is just the start of the story, and isn’t a story itself.
And sometimes it’s just a matter of taste, after all. I literally had way over a hundred submissions for maybe ten spots, so I can be picky. Another editor with the same stories may have made completely different choices.
Thank you again for sending me your story.
What a delightfully thorough brush-off. However, you neglected the most important variable of all: human fallibility. You might want to read Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s The Black Swan with particular attention to the section on Experts and “Empty Suits.”
My, you certainly handle rejection well. I shall remember that for any future submissions.
Touched a nerve did I? I would think an attorney woiuld have thicker skin.
heh! No nerve was touched. I am just happy to know who to avoid in the future, as clearly you would not be a writer that would be accommodating or easy to work with. Thank you for letting me know.
I am sorry I offended your fragile ego. A little bit of snark and you turn tail and run, Clearly, you are no litigator. Most likely a limp-wristed creature of privilege that leads a sheltered existence. You need to grow a set. And maybe wise up and stop taking the bait I keep dangling in front of you. You take yourself far too seriously for someone who purveys nothing more than empty entertainment. Or am I to believe your stories are life-changing?
Don’t do this.
Thank you.
Filed under: writing |
Y’know, he sounds *exactly* like a jerk who showed up on my roth-whitworth timeline, telling me that I was charging too much for my book (never mind I’m not indie, I noted that it was published by a small press, and they and Amazon chose the price). This idiot went on with “an unknown author”, and “I can read people like Asimov and Heinlein in the library”, and was basically asked for a cheaper or free copy of m novel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When I read your rejection letter, I was amazed, both by how kind you were, and by the detail you put into it. I’ve received *many* rejections, but none was ever longer than a brief paragraph! You’re amazing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
If a combatant only has personal attacks, he is admitting he has nothing of substance to say, nothing that speaks directly to the issue at hand.
I notice that he failed to defend his story, failed to point out why his story had merit, and went directly to the ad hominem. So … not exactly a high bar, even so he failed to pass it. (Pun intended.)
Meanwhile I wonder why he says, “It’s the least I can do since I was paid to yank your chain.” That suggests a bit of trollery at work.
I wouldn’t have wasted anymore time on him after his first attempt at insult. I applaud your patience.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Such a fragile ego on this guy. I love the way you needle him into blathering on and making a bigger cool of himself!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow. All I can say is wow.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s funny because it’s true.
LikeLike